In his When Nature Goes Public: The Making and Unmaking of Bioprospecting in Mexico, Cori Hayden explores the social effects of bioprospecting, specifically a bioprospecting effort in Mexico by a United States group referred to as the UNAM-Arizona prospecting agreement. Hayden begins by setting up the following ethnography, paying particular attention to how it is an ethnography of science. He goes on to demonstrate how bioprospecting represents a unique conflux of intellectual property rights, local knowledge, and modern-day entrepreneurship. Hayden next explores some of the more controversial and interesting aspects of the UNAM-Arizona prospecting agreement. For example, he examines how market collection strategy undermines the relationship between intellectual property rights and local knowledge. Hayden then continues by examining how the local knowledge is transformed into scientific knowledge and back again, in other words translating between vernacular and pharmaceutical knowledge constructs.
One interesting discussion that this ethnography brings forward is how the globalized intellectual property rights interact with local knowledge. Intellectual property rights, especially on a global scale, are a novel invention that became necessary due to the explosion of scientific and technological knowledge in the last century. Bioprospecting, on some level, seems to be trying to integrate ancient, local knowledge into this novel idea of intellectual property rights. What implications does this have? What are the ethical considerations that must be made and do they outweigh the potential gain? Is there actual a potential gain, considering no tangible product has emerged from bioprospecting? All these questions stem from the conflux between global intellectual property and local constructs of knowledge.